Crop Nutrition

Sulfur Nutrition in Midwest Soybeans

Robert Mullen, Ph.D.

Robert Mullen

Robert Mullen, Ph.D.

Nutrien

Director of Agronomy

To say Dr. Robert Mullen is passionate about agriculture would be an understatement. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in ag business from Cameron University, along with a Master of Science degree in plant and soil science and a Ph.D. in soil science from Oklahoma State University. In addition, Dr. Mullen has been published in a variety of scientific and trade journals. But it’s not just his academic accomplishments that make him unique. It’s his unwavering ability to take complex data and — in simple terms — explain how it impacts a farmer’s bottom line. Dr. Mullen delivers the kind of insightful observations that can lead to a more profitable business. As a leading agronomy expert, Dr. Mullen has a goal to further educate farmers on best management practices that improve their yields and maximize their return on investment.

Close
Share This:

Sulfur deposition from rainfall has fallen dramatically across the Midwest from the mid-1980s to today. In the mid-1980s, farmers across much of the Midwest could rely upon more than 22 pounds of free sulfur from rainfall every single year. Today, most of the Midwest now receives less than seven pounds annually as sulfur is being scrubbed from emissions at energy production facilities. This means that many of the crops being produced today are more likely to experience sulfur deficiency than they were three decades ago.

In an interview with Agronomy and Farm Management, Dr. Robert Mullen, Director of Agronomy at Nutrien, discusses sulfur deficiencies. One of the crops that can experience sulfur deficiency today is soybeans. Traditionally, sulfur deficiency was thought to occur primarily on coarse-textured, sandy soils that were low in organic matter (those soils are still much more likely to experience sulfur deficiency today, but now we can observe sulfur deficiency on finer-textured soils also). Sulfur deficiency was also much more likely to occur on high sulfur using crops like alfalfa, but soybeans are not a crop that are high sulfur users. In fact, a 60-bushel soybean crop only takes up around 18 pounds of sulfur per acre and removes about 11 pounds per acre when the grain is harvested.

Research conducted by Purdue University over the last few years is identifying soybean response to sulfur. In some cases, yield responses are as high as 13 bushels per acre. Obviously, not every field is going to demonstrate this type of responsiveness. Dr. Shaun Casteel recommends that soybeans that have a nitrogen to sulfur ratio approaching 18:1 (or higher) are more likely to respond to sulfur fertilization. Sulfur fertilization rates are still relatively low with recommendations ranging between 10 to 20 pounds of sulfur per acre.

Take home message – keep an eye on your soybeans. While we have not historically focused on sulfur nutrition in soybeans, it is a crop that is beginning to show some responsiveness.

Changes in sulfate deposition from 1985 to 2017 (measured by the National Atmospheric Deposition Program).